Dubious Books-Writings

Modern Jasher Removed

The modern book of Jasher is a fraud. There are literally hundreds of errors and unrealistic accounts that contradict Torah and all other books in Scripture. It is not part of Scripture or the restored  Apocrypha! The three assumed references in Scripture to Yahshar-Jasher, meaning the Book of the Upright-Tzadikim, are actually references to Jubilees, another name for the Book of the Law for the upright ones or tzadikim. The name Jasher does not even exist in the Hebrew in the context of these texts. The Hebrew adjective Yahshar, does not mean Jasher, it means upright. This assessment is based on the best evidence available at the present time. Therefore we decided to remove it from any further consideration as Scripture. In addition there are way too many more details to cover, however the best scholarship with almost unanimous consent considers what we have today as pure fiction, with some few facts mixed in based on Torah, along with a lot of demonic and perhaps Talmudic embellishment. No known manuscripts exist before the 1800s and modern English translations are translations from Syriac and Greek. Additionally, Jasher does not appear in any copies of the Septuagint or other Hebraic or early “Christian” literature, not even in the Ethiopian Geez Scriptures, which contain just about every apocryphal book ever written. Most significantly no copies were found at Qumran in the library curated by the Zadokites and John the Baptist, the greatest Old testament prophet. For these reasons and many more, the book is no longer valid as restored Scripture and is not included in the latest printing of The Restoration Scriptures Of The True Name Apocrypha With Modern English.©

Maccabees Removed

Maccabees also has been removed [1st and 2nd] in this our latest edition as it is dubious at best, due to the Zadokites-Dead Sea Scrolls exposure of the sons of darkness and the evil High Priest of their day in Jerusalem. These references are directly and clearly pointing to the Hasmonians, who occupied the Temple of that day and hour [150-120 BCE]. It appears that it was the Hasmonians, that actually defiled the Temple in Jerusalem and then turned around and created a fictitious account of events, so as to deflect guilt away from themselves, the true defilers of the Temple, when they themselves evicted the true priesthood according to the Qumran records. They began to use the office as both king and priest, a combination forbidden by Torah, even though they may not have been from the lineage of Tzadok-Zadok. Worse yet, they turned it into a bought for ‘pay for play’ office, in their dealings with Rome. There is far too much evidence of corruption among them, even if the patriarch Mattathias himself was righteous, to honor them and take them seriously. Even modern rabbinic Judaism, does not consider their account reliable enough to be Scripture, despite the fact that they celebrate Chanukah. The John 10:22-23 reference is a poor argument in favor of the Maccabees, as the Messiah walked in the Temple on all Jewish false lunar holidays to teach, evangelize and witness, not to guard and celebrate those false feasts at the wrong time. Several times Scripture states that He went during the solar-lunar feasts of the Jews, not YHUH’s feasts! The same would apply to Chanukah. He was not there to celebrate, but to teach, witness and correct, as seen throughout John chapter 10.

Judith Removed

The biggest problem with The Book of Judith is it was not part of the official canon preserved by the exiled Zadokite priests in Beth Abara at Qumran circa 200 CE. All other cannons are illegitimate according to Torah! All First Covenant books were found at Beth Abara where the true High Priest lived and he, John the Baptist, was curator over the true canon. All First Covenant books were found at Beth Abara  there except the frauds of Maccabees and Judith. Esther is another issue entirely and remains under ongoing RSTNE advisory panel review. The Book of Judith has several issues, including historical inaccuracies, a mix of names, and a possible connection to the Maccabean Revolt:  The book contains historical errors, such as the claim that Nebuchadnezzar II ruled over Nineveh, which was destroyed before he became king. The book includes a mix of Babylonian, Greek, and Persian names. The book's patriotic undertones suggest it was written after the Maccabean Revolt, but the book's political situation doesn't match the Maccabean period.

Judith's identity is unconfirmed, and the town of Bethulia where she is said to have lived has not been discovered. The book's story of the Ammonite Achior converting challenges the prohibition against Ammonites joining the Israelite people. Some scholars believe the Book of Judith is a parable or historical fiction, written during the Second Temple period. Others argue that the book was written under Persian rule, as the political and social situation in the book fits the Persian world. The Book of Judith is not included in the Hebrew Bible or the Protestant Canon of Holy Scripture, but the Catholic Church maintains its canonicity. Several major inaccuracies and missing details in the Book of Judith tell biblical scholars that the story is fictional. Some of the errors in the Book of Judith are glaring.

Jasher  (Yahshar ) 1-25

Jasher (Yahshar) 26-49

Jasher (Yahshar) 50-74

Jasher (Yahshar) 75-91

First Maccabees (Macabeem Alef)

Second Maccabees (Macabeem Bet)

Judith (Yahudite)